Exclusive
"Not Tax Evasion?" Oracle Secures Reversal Victory in Second Trial Over 300 Billion Won Tax Penalty

[비즈한국] It has been confirmed that Oracle, the multinational IT corporation embroiled in a tax appeal lawsuit worth over 1 trillion won in South Korea, has overturned a first-instance ruling and won its appeal against a corporate tax assessment of 300 billion won. The court determined that the Irish entity, to which Oracle Korea paid fees for software use, was actively engaged in business operations and possessed the authority to dispose of its income. This is being viewed as a case where the strategy of global companies to establish entities in "tax havens" to reduce taxes has been validated in court. As a brake is applied to the taxation of multinational corporations, this is expected to become a welcome precedent that may reduce tax risks for other global firms employing similar avoidance strategies.

"Reversal" in Landmark Tax Suit: Oracle Wins Second Trial

Oracle, which had been hit with approximately 300 billion won in tax penalties by the National Tax Service (NTS) for alleged tax evasion, has achieved a "reversal" in the second trial. On the 26th of last month, the 11th Administrative Division of the Seoul High Court (Presiding Judge Choi Soo-hwan) ruled in favor of the plaintiff in an appeal filed by Oracle Korea against the Head of the Samsung District Tax Office to cancel corporate tax collection orders.

Previously, the NTS had initiated a massive corporate tax collection, alleging that Oracle Korea, the company's domestic branch, had evaded taxes by omitting 2 trillion won in revenue from 2011 to 2016. Oracle Korea avoided taxes by routing revenue earned domestically through Ireland—a jurisdiction with a lower tax burden—before sending it to the U.S. headquarters as software usage fees.

This method was applied in Korea starting in early 2008. During this period, Oracle entered into transfer agreements between its Asian branches (including Korea) and a subsidiary established in Ireland, allowing sales fees to be paid to the Irish entity, "Oracle Services." Under the Korea-Ireland tax treaty, no withholding tax was applied.

Oracle is a multinational IT company that develops enterprise software systems and holds over 100 subsidiaries worldwide, with its headquarters in California, USA. Oracle Korea's main business involves the domestic sale and maintenance of Oracle's software. According to audit reports, the company has generated annual domestic revenue exceeding 1 trillion won, reaching 1.0514 trillion won as of the end of May this year, following 1.0059 trillion won the previous year.

This ruling concluded three merged administrative lawsuits, with a total litigation value of 307.59298 billion won. The amounts cover corporate taxes for the respective fiscal years: 17.36944 billion won in 2008, 25.18831 billion won in 2009, 20.37269 billion won in 2010, 109.81029 billion won in 2012, 61.48335 billion won and 9.32425 billion won in 2013, and 63.24719 billion won and 7.90746 billion won in 2014, collected over three separate instances in 2011, 2014, and 2016.

The court accepted Oracle Korea’s claims in full, stating, "The first-instance judgment is unjust as it reached a different conclusion; therefore, we accept the plaintiff’s appeal, overturn the first-instance judgment, and order the cancellation of the dispositions in this case."

"Not a Conduit, but a Substantial Business Operator": Is the 'Fee Avoidance' Structure Validated?

Global Big Tech companies operating worldwide often use methods to transfer revenue to tax havens through multiple paper companies or intermediate subsidiaries, treating the revenue as royalties or intangible asset usage fees, even while generating significant sales in their home countries or high-tax nations. By artificially inflating costs to ensure minimal profits remain in local entities, they minimize taxation in the countries where actual economic activities occur, ultimately accumulating profits in low-tax or tax-free regions.

The court viewed the payments between the Irish entity and Oracle Korea as being closer to usage fee income. The judgment suggests that the tax authority's premise—that the Irish entity was a typical "profit-routing" organization—lacked sufficient grounds.

The court ruled, "It cannot be concluded that Oracle Korea merely acted as a sales agent without receiving know-how or technology. It seems practically impossible for the plaintiff to distribute this software to meet the diverse needs of domestic customers and provide proper consulting and maintenance training services without the transfer of know-how or technology regarding this software from the Irish entity."

The court also recognized Oracle Services as the "beneficial owner," another key point of contention. The judges determined that since Oracle Services' sales and administrative expenses had consistently increased over the 10 years following its establishment, and because the proportion of various costs—such as labor, transportation, telecommunications, depreciation, and travel—relative to sales and gross profit was too high to characterize it as a typical conduit company.

The court explained, "If it were merely a conduit company, it should lack both 'enjoyment of profit' and 'assumption of risk.' However, Oracle Services directly bears business risks such as credit, distribution, and foreign exchange risks, and it also holds a substantial amount of inventory at its Singapore branch."

Furthermore, the court based its decision on the fact that the entity possessed human and material resources, including the operation of offices in Ireland and Singapore and the employment of over 500 staff members, and that the Singapore branch conducted substantial business activities in Asia. It also noted that the entity had diverse sources of income beyond payments from Oracle Korea, such as hardware reselling, direct software provision, and hardware technology service provision.

This ruling is expected to have significant repercussions for tax administration and the tax strategies of multinational corporations. As tax authorities have recently been imposing sanctions on the tax avoidance practices of global IT and platform companies like Google and Netflix—which utilize intangible asset and software license transfer structures—the court has overturned the premise that corporate structure alone deems a company a conduit. Oracle is currently engaged in tax appeal lawsuits totaling 1 trillion won. This judgment could influence other cases.

While the tax risks for multinational corporations may ease, the burden on authorities to prove substance and analyze structures is expected to rise significantly. Attention is now focused on whether the NTS will seek a final judgment from the Supreme Court. The NTS does not comment on its future response to individual corporate lawsuits. Given that this landmark tax appeal resulted in a different outcome from the first trial, it is anticipated that the authority will appeal to the Supreme Court. Oracle Korea has not released an official statement regarding the ruling.